We know that there is a man underneath the loud layers of feminine disguise. There is good old-fashioned seething misogyny hidden underneath the language of inclusivity, diversity, equality, kindness.
Sorry - if you have a penis, you are not a woman. Putting on a wig, lipstick, and a dress doesn’t make you a woman any more than putting on antlers makes you a deer.
I don’t know if it’s true, but I have heard that some of the more radical alphabet people tried to bring pedophilia (minor attracted persons) into the rainbow. That was quickly abandoned once parents went berserk.
There was a professor in the Northeast (I don’t remember where) whose research was trying to normalize pedophilia. She wound up being fired from her university after boosters, students, and parents inundated the university with complaints.
This is why it is open-ended, why there is a +.(and why many gay people are outraged that they are forced to be grouped with all that). There were numerous efforts to mainstream paedophilia, both in Europe and the States. There was a "charity" organisation, for example, in California called "Prostasia" (that's Greek for "protection" which of course is hilarious on so many levels) that was trying to "protect" MAPs (in case you are one of the lucky ones who are still ignorant of the filth that's out there, stands for “minor-attracted persons "). There was another guy campaigning openly in Seattle for the "Rights" of Maps as well. Both of these guys are (surprise!Surprise! Trans of course). And so were others doing the same in Germany, Sweden etc. If you take a closer look, you will notice that the two movements (Trans and Maps) are intriguingly linked. Take a look at all the links I have added to this essay (the conclusion that the two movements (aka paraphilias) are linked will be inescapable): https://fanitsa.substack.com/p/why-is-it-that-even-when-the-sheeps
I think that the current efforts to sexualize children are pervasive but are not yet obvious to the public. Colin Wright covered at least one serious academic paper demanding that we decolonize children's sexuality and let them experience pleasure without troubling them about the dangers of pregnancy or STIs too much. A lot of young women are suffering actual brain injuries now that their partners are exposed to strangulation porn. The dangers are escalating. Academics get published by making novel statements and using obfuscating language to convince their audiences that they have mastered a body of knowledge. It is bullshit.
"We recognise it. We’ve seen it before. It is unmistakably familiar. And it’s so old, it’s practically archaic…" Red Riding Hood is a very old story. Sexual mimicry evolved in other species as a means of sneaking in for a mating opportunity. It is performed in humans by men who make themselves appear less-threatening to women and children. This has always existed, but our distant ancestors had the sense to recognize it. I am an atheist, but the Biblical admonition for men and women to wear the culturally appropriate costume assigned to their sex might have derived from ancient peoples' ability to see how the deception plays out. I am no fan of strict enforcement of gender roles. I very well understand women not wanting to be women in this world. But the deception of men playing women, caricaturing them, is harmful.
There are now too many parties profiting from this fraud, too much money at stake, and too much political power having been captured by a poisonous ideology.
Sex is a biological reality. I am sympathetic to people with developmental disorders. I am unsympathetic to bullies who imagine that human brains need to be rewired from an early age to accept falsehoods.
Sorry - if you have a penis, you are not a woman. Putting on a wig, lipstick, and a dress doesn’t make you a woman any more than putting on antlers makes you a deer.
Well said!
This is absolutely nuts. If you parachuted someone in from the 1990s and showed them this nonsense, that person would think we were absolutely insane.
And God only knows what comes next... because there's always that: if people believe all this nonsense, things can only escalate...
I don’t know if it’s true, but I have heard that some of the more radical alphabet people tried to bring pedophilia (minor attracted persons) into the rainbow. That was quickly abandoned once parents went berserk.
There was a professor in the Northeast (I don’t remember where) whose research was trying to normalize pedophilia. She wound up being fired from her university after boosters, students, and parents inundated the university with complaints.
This is why it is open-ended, why there is a +.(and why many gay people are outraged that they are forced to be grouped with all that). There were numerous efforts to mainstream paedophilia, both in Europe and the States. There was a "charity" organisation, for example, in California called "Prostasia" (that's Greek for "protection" which of course is hilarious on so many levels) that was trying to "protect" MAPs (in case you are one of the lucky ones who are still ignorant of the filth that's out there, stands for “minor-attracted persons "). There was another guy campaigning openly in Seattle for the "Rights" of Maps as well. Both of these guys are (surprise!Surprise! Trans of course). And so were others doing the same in Germany, Sweden etc. If you take a closer look, you will notice that the two movements (Trans and Maps) are intriguingly linked. Take a look at all the links I have added to this essay (the conclusion that the two movements (aka paraphilias) are linked will be inescapable): https://fanitsa.substack.com/p/why-is-it-that-even-when-the-sheeps
I think that the current efforts to sexualize children are pervasive but are not yet obvious to the public. Colin Wright covered at least one serious academic paper demanding that we decolonize children's sexuality and let them experience pleasure without troubling them about the dangers of pregnancy or STIs too much. A lot of young women are suffering actual brain injuries now that their partners are exposed to strangulation porn. The dangers are escalating. Academics get published by making novel statements and using obfuscating language to convince their audiences that they have mastered a body of knowledge. It is bullshit.
"We recognise it. We’ve seen it before. It is unmistakably familiar. And it’s so old, it’s practically archaic…" Red Riding Hood is a very old story. Sexual mimicry evolved in other species as a means of sneaking in for a mating opportunity. It is performed in humans by men who make themselves appear less-threatening to women and children. This has always existed, but our distant ancestors had the sense to recognize it. I am an atheist, but the Biblical admonition for men and women to wear the culturally appropriate costume assigned to their sex might have derived from ancient peoples' ability to see how the deception plays out. I am no fan of strict enforcement of gender roles. I very well understand women not wanting to be women in this world. But the deception of men playing women, caricaturing them, is harmful.
There are now too many parties profiting from this fraud, too much money at stake, and too much political power having been captured by a poisonous ideology.
Sex is a biological reality. I am sympathetic to people with developmental disorders. I am unsympathetic to bullies who imagine that human brains need to be rewired from an early age to accept falsehoods.
Superb post. Subscribed! Xxx
Thank you so much! I appreciate it.
Precisely, it takes a man for shit like this to happen.
Thank you for the article
Right? Thanks for reading! I appreciate it.